Posts Tagged ‘ microsoft ’

32-Bit Fixed

A while ago I added a 4th gigabyte of RAM to my system in the hopes of squeezing out a little bit more performance out of my (relatively) dated PC (running Core 2 Duo E8200 CPU), however after checking the system properties I was rather annoyed to see –>> 4.00 GB (3.00 GB usable), meaning that the additional gig was a complete waste as the system was unable to utilize the extra RAM.  The reason for this being a limitation with the 32-bit architecture that the operating system uses.  This brings us to the topic at hand, a solution is needed and given the fact that my CPU uses a 64-bit design the logical conclusion point to rectifying my RAM issue was to upgrade to a 64-bit version of Windows, something that I’ve been very apprehensive about due to the amount of incompatibilities with the majority of software out there, but regardless of that I pressed forward and  upgraded to a 64-bit version of Windows 7 and the result was rather pleasing.

Well the first and most obvious thing after installing the 64-bit operating system was that it now registered all 4 gigs of the RAM and with that came a noticeable performance increase, not only does Windows initialize faster, but games like Skyrim and Need for Speed: The Run were running at a much higher frame rate.  The second thing I noticed is that apart from the typical Program Files folder there was an additional Program Files (x86) directory, which I never anticipated.  This means that any of the old non-64-bit software is automatically allocated to the Program Files (x86) directory negating any compatibility issues.  So I was pretty pleased that I could use all my old software though obviously I did need to download a few new versions of certain applications and drivers such as a 64-bit version of the ATi Catalyst suite and iTunes. In case you were wondering x86 is the designation for an operating system with a 32-bit architecture and x64 (technically x86-64) is that of its 64-bit successor.

After switching to a 64-bit operating system, all 4GB of memory now register.

So apart from being able to support more than 4GB of RAM, a 64-bit architecture also has an added benefit of being more secure, this is because most malware and malicious code is written for 32-bit software, and writing code for 64-bit is a bit more difficult considering that you have to write to address 64 bits (integers) instead of 32 bits. Encryption, in this sense, will be more effective.  So all-in-all, it was definitely worthwhile switching over to a 64-bit operating system, I’m only sorry it took me so long to do so.

Repairing a ‘dynamic invalid drive’ in Windows

Not too long ago I was required to disconnect my SATA hard drive in my PC (for various reasons) with the intention of just plugging it back in after, no big deal…except that it was.  When I plugged it back in, it was not found in the familiar >Computer< section in Windows (I’m running Windows 7 Ultimate) alongside all my other drives.

So then I started to investigate, starting with checking the BIOS settings, sure enough, in the BIOS my SATA drive was indeed detected so naturally the problem would have to be with Windows.  So I check >Device Manager< and there sits my SATA drive but inaccessible.  So, frustration growing, I go to >Disk Management< (Over » Windows 7 Start Button “Start” type in » Perform (Edit-Box) “diskmgmt.msc” [ENTER]).  Once I’m there, much to my annoyance, my 250gig SATA drive is listed as being a dynamic invalid drive and is completely inaccessible.

Disk 0 - Completely unusable.

So Windows then gives you the option to revert the drive to a ‘basic drive’ allowing it to be usable once again except it assumes that you have access to the drive already and that you’re able to back up your data before doing so because once you convert it all your data will be lost. Yes, well done Microsoft, If I could access the drive in the first place there wouldn’t be a problem to begin with now would there?

So then I turned to Google and found a $300 application that was capable of reverting my drive back into a usable state, luckily I obtained it sans having to pay that amount and just as well because it did not fucking work! After an hour or so of forum-reading and whatnot I found a small, 2.82mb Open Source application called Testdisk 6 which not only duplicated my data from the inaccessible drive to an external source, but managed to convert my hard drive back to a ‘basic’ usable one in a few seconds without formatting the drive.  Check out this site for a step-by-step guide on how to achieve this.

Windows 7

5555081

Just pray you don't need to purchase all that stuff to get Windows 7 to work...

When I first used Windows Vista I was running an entry-level machine (AMD Sempron cpu, Radeon 9250 gpu, 1 gig ram etc) and the OS utterly destroyed my machine.  Not only was my hardware incapable of running Vista effectively, there were also hardware components that weren’t compatible, such as my soundcard and the 1 gig of ram that I had in the PC (that was more than sufficient for Windows XP) struggled to meet the requirements of the resource-hungry software.  Let’s not forget the myriad of software applications that were rendered obsolete due to the fact that backwards compatibility was pretty much an alien concept for Vista.

So after a huge upgrade (dual-core processing, 3 gigs ram, Radeon 4870 gpu etc) I found that I had Vista under control due to the fact that I had overpowered it into submission (hooray!).  I also found that I had an easier time using Vista when I had hardware that was ‘Vista Certified’ although there were still things like the Vista Certified Verbatim 250 gig external hard-drive that would not work on the OS, it worked on XP and Linux Ubuntu, but not Vista.

I know that everyone complained about Vista; resource hungry, poor backwards compatibility, incessantly being harassed by ‘security’ messages and so on but I had the OS installed for 15 months and I seldom experienced any major problems.

So finally after hearing so much about Windows 7, I decided to format my PC and install Microsoft’s latest piece of software to see what all the fuss is about.  Windows 7 has already been called Microsoft’s best operating system since Windows XP, so I decided to judge that for myself.  One of the main things that Windows 7 is supposed to address is the backwards compatibility issue that plagued the previous OS.  Windows 7 is supposed to be XP app friendly and since Win7 is based upon the Vista architecture, it should have no problems running Vista software either. Sadly, that wasn’t the case.

I know that Win7 has only been out officially for 5 days or so but I had a tough time getting everything to work properly on the OS. Win7 seems to be even more hostile towards older applications than Vista and I ended up spending ages online trying to find new software that would actually run on Win7.  Considering that the BETA version and various other versions of Win7 have been available for download, be it official downloads or illegal, you’d think that people would spend time testing the OS before its official release to see if it had any major issues, specially since Microsoft has been making a big deal about how backwards compatible their new baby supposedly is.

Below, I’ve listed some applications that no longer work in Windows 7, forcing me to find alternatives, very frustrating indeed.

  • Daemon tools lite: any version below 4.35 will not work properly and Win7 will pop up with a ‘this product has known software incompatibility issues’ message.  What the fuck Microsoft? The first thing I install and there’s a compatibility issue?!
  • FabDVD Decrpyter 4 & 5:  both of these apps failed to install correctly forcing me to upgrade to version 6, bearing in mind that you have to pay for FabDVD software, as well as the aforementioned Daemon tools.
  • The older version of Comodo firewall wouldn’t initialize so I checked online for firewalls that are supported by Win7, I downloaded a few (freeware of course) and when I tried to install them I was met with more compatibility error messages *sighs*
  • My version of AVG Antivirus had to be upgraded too.
  • My gigabyte motherboard drivers, specifically the RealtekHD drivers, were incompatible, meaning that I had to spend an eternity finding audio drivers that actually worked.

Those are just a few of the apps that no longer work on the OS (I’m using the x86/32bit version btw).  I couldn’t install cccp codec pack because Win7 doesn’t have D3D 9 binaries meaning I had to go to Microsoft’s website and download the damn file before I could install my codec pack.  Speaking of which, MS Media Player Classic cannot effectively play mkv or ogg files that are subtitled (like anime) since it’s unable to display sub-titles, only hard-coded subs (such as those found on avi files) worked.  I’m not sure if it’s the codec pack or what, but DVD video quality is horrendous when using vlc player, mpc or PowerDVD, so I ended up having to use Media Player 12 to watch DVDs.

Through my persistence I persevered and once I had replaced all the old software with apps that were actually compatible I found that Win7 is actually quite intuitive and easy to use, although the new task bar took some getting used to.  Some applications like Windows Movie Maker have been omitted from Win7 (though you are able to download it from Microsoft’s site if you like) and there’s no more resource-chowing sidebar like in Vista, though you are able to attach widgets to your desktop (right-click in explorer >> gadgets).

The Windows firewall has been much improved, however I still don’t trust it and use a third-party alternative (Outpost ftw).  There are now various aero themes to choose from, all of which are accompanied by their own sound schemes and the OS now comes with DirectX11, how that will affect games and 3D apps remains to be seen.  Win7 also uses 10% less ram than its predecessor although if you intend on using the x64/64-bit variant of the OS you’ll need a minimum of 2 gigs ram.  The other problem with the 64-bit version is that there are going to be a lot of old XP apps that simply wont run, so if you installed Win7 with the hopes of playing some old game that wouldn’t work on Vista, make sure you’re using the 32-bit version.

As with every Windows OS installment, Win7 looks very pretty, more so than Vista, it uses a very clean and attractive interface that’s very nice to look at and navigate around.  I’m sure I’ve only scratched the surface of what Win7 has to offer and further investigation will yield new things (be they good or bad), however if you’ve been using Vista hassle-free, I don’t see much benefit to upgrading to Windows 7, it’s just more of the same really, like a reconfigured, more secure version of Vista.  Linux users will probably scoff at the OS since their platform of choice has already been able to do what Win7 is capable of as far as internet security and stability is concerned and MS fan-boys will have a new toy to play with, albeit an expensive one.  So all in all, I wouldn’t say it’s imperative that you upgrade to Win7 at this moment but if curiosity gets the better of you (such as in my case), give Win7 a try.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.